概要:基于全壽命周期成本理論,計算了各類儲能裝置的成本和度電成本,研究表明抽水蓄能電站度電成本最低,其次是壓縮空氣儲能,電池類儲能度電成本最高,其中電池類儲能度電成本由低到高依次為鋰離子電池、液流電池、鈉硫電池和鉛酸電池。近幾年鋰離子電池成本下降較快,未來鋰離子電池成本進一步下降后,初步測算儲能年利用小時數能夠達到1500h以上,度電成本將低于0.50元/(kW·h)。
分析如下:
對幾種典型(xing)儲能(neng)(neng)電(dian)(dian)站(zhan)(zhan)的度電(dian)(dian)成本進(jin)行測算(suan),比較各(ge)類儲能(neng)(neng)設備的經(jing)濟性,考(kao)慮的儲能(neng)(neng)設備包(bao)括抽水(shui)蓄能(neng)(neng)電(dian)(dian)站(zhan)(zhan),壓縮空氣儲能(neng)(neng)、鉛(qian)酸電(dian)(dian)池、鈉(na)硫電(dian)(dian)池、液流電(dian)(dian)池、鋰(li)離子電(dian)(dian)池,其基本參數見表1。
表1儲能電站參數
以(yi)目(mu)前較為(wei)成(cheng)熟的(de)抽(chou)蓄電站為(wei)基準,儲(chu)能(neng)裝(zhuang)機(ji)按(an)1200MW,儲(chu)能(neng)時長按(an)6h,計(ji)(ji)算中(zhong)電池使用壽命暫按(an)儲(chu)能(neng)放電深度80%情(qing)況下(xia),1年循(xun)環300次(ci),液流電池循(xun)環次(ci)數(shu)達12000次(ci)以(yi)上,計(ji)(ji)算中(zhong)按(an)20年計(ji)(ji)列。
儲能(neng)電站(zhan)投(tou)資(zi)如(ru)表2所示(shi),儲能(neng)電站(zhan)度電成本測(ce)算結果見(jian)表3和圖(tu)1,可以看(kan)出:
(1)按上述參數計算,抽蓄電(dian)(dian)站的(de)度電(dian)(dian)成(cheng)本(ben)(ben)最低,其(qi)次是壓縮空(kong)氣(qi),電(dian)(dian)池(chi)(chi)(chi)類(lei)儲(chu)能度電(dian)(dian)成(cheng)本(ben)(ben)最高,其(qi)中電(dian)(dian)池(chi)(chi)(chi)類(lei)儲(chu)能度電(dian)(dian)成(cheng)本(ben)(ben)由低到高依次為鋰離子電(dian)(dian)池(chi)(chi)(chi)、液(ye)流(liu)電(dian)(dian)池(chi)(chi)(chi)、鈉(na)硫電(dian)(dian)池(chi)(chi)(chi)和鉛酸電(dian)(dian)池(chi)(chi)(chi)。
(2)若(ruo)儲(chu)能(neng)(neng)電(dian)站(zhan)的儲(chu)能(neng)(neng)利(li)用小時(shi)數達到1000h,抽(chou)蓄電(dian)站(zhan)儲(chu)能(neng)(neng)度電(dian)成(cheng)本(ben)(ben)低(di)于(yu)1元(yuan)(yuan)(yuan)/(kW·h),約(yue)(yue)0.93元(yuan)(yuan)(yuan)/(kW·h),壓縮空(kong)氣儲(chu)能(neng)(neng)度電(dian)成(cheng)本(ben)(ben)約(yue)(yue)1.85元(yuan)(yuan)(yuan)/(kW·h),鋰(li)離(li)子(zi)電(dian)池儲(chu)能(neng)(neng)度電(dian)成(cheng)本(ben)(ben)約(yue)(yue)2.04元(yuan)(yuan)(yuan)/(kW·h);若(ruo)儲(chu)能(neng)(neng)電(dian)站(zhan)的儲(chu)能(neng)(neng)利(li)用小時(shi)數達到2000h,抽(chou)蓄電(dian)站(zhan)儲(chu)能(neng)(neng)度電(dian)成(cheng)本(ben)(ben)低(di)于(yu)0.5元(yuan)(yuan)(yuan)/(kW·h),約(yue)(yue)0.46元(yuan)(yuan)(yuan)/(kW·h),壓縮空(kong)氣儲(chu)能(neng)(neng)度電(dian)成(cheng)本(ben)(ben)低(di)于(yu)1元(yuan)(yuan)(yuan)/(kW·h),約(yue)(yue)0.92元(yuan)(yuan)(yuan)/(kW·h),鋰(li)離(li)子(zi)電(dian)池儲(chu)能(neng)(neng)度電(dian)成(cheng)本(ben)(ben)降低(di)至約(yue)(yue)1.02元(yuan)(yuan)(yuan)/(kW·h)。
表2各類(lei)儲能電站的投資(zi)比較
表3各類儲能(neng)電站的年發電量和度電成本
圖1儲能電站度(du)電成本(ben)曲線
表4各類儲(chu)能電站的年發電量和(he)度(du)電成(cheng)本(敏(min)感性(xing)分析)
圖2儲能(neng)電站度電成本曲(qu)線(敏感性分析(xi))
對除抽蓄電(dian)站(zhan)外(wai)的其他(ta)儲(chu)能(neng)型式相(xiang)關參數(shu)進行敏(min)感性分析,若未來壓縮(suo)空氣(qi)單(dan)位投資(zi)降低至與(yu)抽蓄電(dian)站(zhan)投資(zi)相(xiang)當,電(dian)能(neng)轉換效率提高至65%;電(dian)池(chi)類(lei)儲(chu)能(neng)的單(dan)位投資(zi)降低50%,鋰(li)離子電(dian)池(chi)循(xun)環壽(shou)命(ming)達到5000次,儲(chu)能(neng)電(dian)站(zhan)的度電(dian)成本測算結果見(jian)表4和圖2。可以看出:
(1)按上(shang)述參數計(ji)算,抽水蓄能(neng)電(dian)(dian)站(zhan)和壓縮空氣的度電(dian)(dian)成本(ben)基本(ben)相(xiang)當,主要原因是壓縮空氣建設期(qi)較(jiao)短導(dao)致年(nian)費用較(jiao)低,電(dian)(dian)池(chi)(chi)類儲能(neng)度電(dian)(dian)成本(ben)最(zui)高(gao)(gao),其中電(dian)(dian)池(chi)(chi)類儲能(neng)度電(dian)(dian)成本(ben)由(you)低到(dao)高(gao)(gao)依次為鋰離子電(dian)(dian)池(chi)(chi)、液流(liu)電(dian)(dian)池(chi)(chi)、鈉硫電(dian)(dian)池(chi)(chi)和鉛(qian)酸(suan)電(dian)(dian)池(chi)(chi)。
(2)若儲(chu)能電(dian)(dian)(dian)站的儲(chu)能利(li)用小時數達(da)到1000h,壓(ya)(ya)縮空氣(qi)(qi)儲(chu)能度(du)電(dian)(dian)(dian)成本(ben)低(di)(di)(di)于1元(yuan)(yuan)/(kW·h),約0.88元(yuan)(yuan)/(kW·h),鋰(li)離(li)子(zi)電(dian)(dian)(dian)池儲(chu)能度(du)電(dian)(dian)(dian)成本(ben)約0.79元(yuan)(yuan)/(kW·h);若儲(chu)能電(dian)(dian)(dian)站的儲(chu)能利(li)用小時數達(da)到2000h,壓(ya)(ya)縮空氣(qi)(qi)儲(chu)能度(du)電(dian)(dian)(dian)成本(ben)低(di)(di)(di)于0.5元(yuan)(yuan)/(kW·h),約0.44元(yuan)(yuan)/(kW·h),鋰(li)離(li)子(zi)電(dian)(dian)(dian)池儲(chu)能度(du)電(dian)(dian)(dian)成本(ben)低(di)(di)(di)于0.5元(yuan)(yuan)/(kW·h),約0.39元(yuan)(yuan)/(kW·h)。
需要說(shuo)明(ming)的(de)(de)是(shi),儲(chu)(chu)能(neng)(neng)(neng)(neng)(neng)應(ying)(ying)(ying)用(yong)于(yu)不(bu)同場(chang)景(jing),運用(yong)方式也(ye)(ye)不(bu)一樣(yang),對于(yu)目(mu)前(qian)應(ying)(ying)(ying)用(yong)較(jiao)多(duo)的(de)(de)用(yong)戶側(ce)儲(chu)(chu)能(neng)(neng)(neng)(neng)(neng)來說(shuo),由于(yu)負荷曲線基本(ben)(ben)固定,儲(chu)(chu)能(neng)(neng)(neng)(neng)(neng)運行方式明(ming)確,每(mei)天可以(yi)按照基本(ben)(ben)相同策略運行,利(li)用(yong)效率比較(jiao)高,東部(bu)部(bu)分地區(qu)儲(chu)(chu)能(neng)(neng)(neng)(neng)(neng)年利(li)用(yong)小(xiao)時數在(zai)2000h左(zuo)右,儲(chu)(chu)能(neng)(neng)(neng)(neng)(neng)度(du)(du)電(dian)成本(ben)(ben)相對較(jiao)低(di),再加上峰谷電(dian)價差相對較(jiao)高,儲(chu)(chu)能(neng)(neng)(neng)(neng)(neng)存在(zai)盈利(li)空間(jian);但對于(yu)發電(dian)側(ce)儲(chu)(chu)能(neng)(neng)(neng)(neng)(neng)應(ying)(ying)(ying)用(yong)與減少(shao)新能(neng)(neng)(neng)(neng)(neng)源棄電(dian)場(chang)景(jing),由于(yu)棄電(dian)不(bu)是(shi)每(mei)天都(dou)會發生,棄電(dian)大小(xiao)也(ye)(ye)不(bu)一樣(yang),所(suo)以(yi)儲(chu)(chu)能(neng)(neng)(neng)(neng)(neng)應(ying)(ying)(ying)用(yong)于(yu)此場(chang)景(jing),利(li)率用(yong)明(ming)顯較(jiao)低(di),初步(bu)測算,西北區(qu)域(yu)儲(chu)(chu)能(neng)(neng)(neng)(neng)(neng)應(ying)(ying)(ying)用(yong)年利(li)用(yong)小(xiao)時數在(zai)1000h左(zuo)右,所(suo)以(yi)儲(chu)(chu)能(neng)(neng)(neng)(neng)(neng)度(du)(du)電(dian)成本(ben)(ben)明(ming)顯較(jiao)高,儲(chu)(chu)能(neng)(neng)(neng)(neng)(neng)盈利(li)模式尚需進(jin)一步(bu)研究。